An in-depth interview of petitioner challenging the AADHAR in the SC


"The proposition that two biometrics together will work more effectively in the field than accepting one photographic document and sending a text message (widespread possession of both a paper identification and a telephone is a little known fact emerging from documented UIDAI figures) is the outcome of searching for a problem to which this solution can be somehow fitted.

However, security is not the vault, it is the contents. And the most precious item added to the archives while digitising them is the UID number, the one branded by the UIDAI, which fiercely marketed the mandatory linking of the number to all kinds of records, some relating to welfare services, others merely aimed at coercing the well-off to comply.

As a first principle, not collecting data in the first place is paramount to data security. Whatever data is collected, must be collected strictly and minimally, according to the need. Whenever data is shared, the first step must be to erase links between individuals and other data, before allowing duplication".

An in-depth interview of petitioner challenging the AADHAR in the SC An in-depth interview of petitioner challenging the AADHAR in the SC Reviewed by Kanthala Raghu on December 23, 2017 Rating: 5

No comments:

Song of the Week: Vancouver Sleep Clinic - Someone to Stay

Powered by Blogger.